planetscale.com vs github.com
Core Web Vitals side-by-side, Chrome user field data
planetscale.com wins 4 of 5 vitals.
| Metric | planetscale.com | github.com | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCPLargest Contentful Paint | 1658ms | 1720ms | planetscale.com |
| INPInteraction to Next Paint | 48ms | 76ms | planetscale.com |
| CLSCumulative Layout Shift | 0.00 | 0.05 | planetscale.com |
| FCPFirst Contentful Paint | 1562ms | 1522ms | github.com |
| TTFBTime to First Byte | 406ms | 1153ms | planetscale.com |
planetscale.com
LCPgood
1658ms
Largest Contentful Paint
INPgood
48ms
Interaction to Next Paint
CLSgood
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
github.com
LCPgood
1720ms
Largest Contentful Paint
INPgood
76ms
Interaction to Next Paint
CLSgood
0.05
Cumulative Layout Shift
How to read this
Scores come from real Chrome users visiting these sites in the last 28 days, aggregated by Google's CrUX. Lower is better for all metrics. Green = "good," amber = "needs improvement," red = "poor." Learn more about Core Web Vitals or read our CrUX vs Lighthouse guide.